Tyr
 I cybered with Kayte
Ballkicks: (+479 / -130)
Posts: 4815 (0.695)
Reg. Date: Mar 2002
Location: Then and Now
Gender: Male |
(Originally posted on: 08-06-04 12:11:40 AM)
Edit Post
| Edit History
| Send PM
| Change Title
| Reply w/Quote
| Report Post
| Ignore
| Show All Posts
http://forums.interestingnonetheless.net/display.php?tid=16208&postid=350062#post350062
This is a post that drahnier made.
http://forums.interestingnonetheless.net/display.php?tid=16327&postid=350555#post350555
This is a post I made, and got warned by Vervet for, under these clauses:
Quoted from Tyr, Jan 4 2004: 1) If you think something someone says is stupid, even if it's in a thread here, you start a new goddamn thread bitching them out. If you flame them slightly, but still add to the conversation in a specific thread, that's fine. Otherwise, you're going to suffer the full extent of my e-rancor.
2) If you think you're funny, witty, clever, saucy, etc. (You're not, actually), and you fill threads with an excess of stereotypical catch phrases, e-fashionable sayings or euphemisms that are reminiscient of spam, you will receive a warning and/or be banned, based on the severity and (if applicable) consistency of your actions.
3) Also prone to descretion are similar posts as mentioned in (2), that are reminiscient of postcounting.
I called a spade a spade.
drahnier took a cheap shot that has generally been considered rude and inappropriate.
While I love drahnier, I don't mind selling him out to prove to you all how shitty an administrator Vervet is.
Not to mention, my post doesn't even fall under those clauses she cited for reasons. I added to the conversation by saying that Brad was sucky at responding, and yeah I flamed him; I mean come on, that guy is a douchebag.
In closing, this is my thread bitching about Vervet as an administrator. Hilariously, this will be turned against me for complaining about staff, even though it just boils down to Vervet needing a reprimand.
|